COPPER

A PS Audio Publication

Issue 68 • Free Online Magazine

Issue 68 VINTAGE WHINE

50 Ways to Read a Record Part 4

50 Ways to Read a Record Part 4

In our last installment, we looked at the range of record groove sizes that were used through the years, and we jumped ahead a bit to the launch of Stereo. In this column we’ll backtrack a bit and look at the record-tracing hardware of the Hi-Fi boom in the ’50s, leading up to the Stereo era.

Microgroove LPs brought with them new concerns regarding tracking. The lighter tracking weights (compared to 78s) increased the likelihood of the stylus jumping out of the groove due to vibration caused by footfalls or acoustic feedback. In addition, the soft vinyl compounds used for LPs were more prone to scratching than the shellac and clay amalgam used in 78s.

A new generation of phono cartridges and tonearms was needed to replace the massive arms and carts of the 78 era. As we saw back in Part 2, ground-up designs like the GE Variable Reluctance line of cartridges and the Fairchild moving coil cartridge designed by Joseph Grado, led the way in lighter, smaller, better-tracking playback gear. The sonic spectacular records often used to show off the new Hi-Fi set required more compliant cartridges to track them, in turn requiring lower-mass tonearms. Although the term “tonearm” was still used in the Hi-Fi and later stereo eras, the term no longer properly described the arm’s function, as it did in early acoustic phonographs. In those days the tonearm carried the needle and sound box which generated the sonic output; sound was then channeled down the interior of the arm, which formed a section of the gramophone’s horn.

Stronger permanent magnet materials developed during World War II made possible the magnetic phono cartridges that quickly  the choice of audio aficionados of the Hi-Fi era.  Cartridges like the Pickering shown in the ad above often featured turnover stylus assemblies which allowed the listener to play both 78s and LPs, at lower tracking weights and with greater precision than earlier ceramic cartridges. Magnetic cartridges had far lower electrical output than ceramics, requiring more-sensitive phono preamps with lower noise—units like the Marantz unit shown above, often referred to as the Model 1. Given the sensitivity of the phono stage, it’s a little astonishing to see the Marantz unit incorporated into a turntable base, in close proximity to the electrical and magnetic fields generated by the turntable motor. Let’s hope everything was well-shielded!

Trackability became an even greater concern with the onset of 45/45 single-groove stereo, as mistracking would be unpleasantly evident in two channels, rather than just one. In addition, mistracking  could affect the channel balance, distorting or even destroying the stereo illusion. At the beginning of the era, some popular cartridges could be converted from mono to stereo. This article from Audio magazine showed how they converted one of the popular GE VR cartridges:

Cutting lathes generally moved the cutting head across the disc with a parallel-tracking arm rather than a pivoted one. Even on home record-cutting units like this Presto, such was the standard:

Logically enough, tonearms appeared which attempted to duplicate the action of the cutting head and eliminate tracking era. There were two basic approaches to maintaining the cartridge tangent to the groove: a true tangential arm, moving the cartridge and arm on a track or trolley across the record; or a somewhat simpler approach using a pantographic, pivoted arrangement. Both design approaches required low friction: any sticking during record playback would likely generate more tracking error than the conventional arms the parallel-trackers were designed to replace.

The tracking requirements of single-groove stereo discs heightened the interest in parallel-tracking. Even earlier mono arms like the English Burne-Jones pantographic arm were converted to stereo:

An early example of a tangential arm was the Truline—here shown with two cartridges for playing back Cook Labs binaural records:

Both types of arms still exist today, in addition to the usual pivoted arms.

In our next installment, we’ll follow the continued development of playback gear as the stereo era progressed.

More from Issue 68

View All Articles in Issue 68

Search Copper Magazine

#225 Capital Audiofest 2025: Must-See Stereo, Part One by Frank Doris Dec 01, 2025 #225 Otis Taylor and the Electrics Delivers a Powerful Set of Hypnotic Modern Blues by Frank Doris Dec 01, 2025 #225 A Christmas Miracle by B. Jan Montana Dec 01, 2025 #225 T.H.E. Show New York 2025, Part Two: Plenty to See, Hear, and Enjoy by Frank Doris Dec 01, 2025 #225 Underappreciated Artists, Part One: Martin Briley by Rich Isaacs Dec 01, 2025 #225 Rock and Roll is Here to Stay by Wayne Robins Dec 01, 2025 #225 A Lifetime of Holiday Record (and CD) Listening by Rudy Radelic Dec 01, 2025 #225 Little Feat: Not Saying Goodbye, Not Yet by Ray Chelstowski Dec 01, 2025 #225 How to Play in a Rock Band, Part 18: Dealing With Burnout by Frank Doris Dec 01, 2025 #225 The People Who Make Audio Happen: CanJam SoCal 2025 by Harris Fogel Dec 01, 2025 #225 Chicago’s Sonic Sanctuaries: Four Hi‑Fi Listening Bars Channeling the Jazz‑Kissa Spirit by Olivier Meunier-Plante Dec 01, 2025 #225 From The Audiophile’s Guide: Controlling Bass Frequencies Through Membrane Absorbers (and How to Build Your Own) by Paul McGowan Dec 01, 2025 #225 Your Editor’s Tips for Attending Audio Shows by Frank Doris Dec 01, 2025 #225 PS Audio in the News by Frank Doris Dec 01, 2025 #225 Back to My Reel-to-Reel Roots, Part 24 by Ken Kessler Dec 01, 2025 #225 Holiday Music by Frank Doris Dec 01, 2025 #225 Puppy Prognostication by Peter Xeni Dec 01, 2025 #225 How to Post Comments on Copper by Frank Doris Dec 01, 2025 #225 Living Color by Rudy Radelic Dec 01, 2025 #224 T.H.E. Show New York 2025, Part One: A New Beginning by Frank Doris Nov 03, 2025 #224 Fool’s Leap of Faith is the Extraordinary Octave Records Debut from Singer/Songwriter Tyler Burba and Visit by Frank Doris Nov 03, 2025 #224 The Beatles’ “Aeolian Cadences.” What? by Wayne Robins Nov 03, 2025 #224 Persona Non Grata by B. Jan Montana Nov 03, 2025 #224 Talking With Recording Engineer Barry Diament of Soundkeeper Recordings, Part Two by Frank Doris Nov 03, 2025 #224 B Sides, B Movies, and Beware of Zombies by Rudy Radelic Nov 03, 2025 #224 The Burn-In Chronicles: 1,000 Hours to Sonic Salvation by Olivier Meunier-Plante Nov 03, 2025 #224 A Conversation With Mat Weisfeld of VPI Industries by Joe Caplan Nov 03, 2025 #224 Blues-Rocker Kenny Wayne Shepherd Celebrates 30 Years of Ledbetter Heights by Ray Chelstowski Nov 03, 2025 #224 Playing in a Rock Band, 17: When Good Gigs Go Bad, Part Two by Frank Doris Nov 03, 2025 #224 From The Audiophile’s Guide: Dealing with Odd-Shaped Rooms by Paul McGowan Nov 03, 2025 #224 TEAC’s TN-3B-SE Turntable Plays Bob Dylan by Howard Kneller Nov 03, 2025 #224 PS Audio in the News by Frank Doris Nov 03, 2025 #224 Lost in Translation by Peter Xeni Nov 03, 2025 #224 Reel-to-Reel Roots, Part 23: Better Than Rice Krispies by Ken Kessler Nov 03, 2025 #224 I Bring Joy! by Frank Doris Nov 03, 2025 #224 Screen Test by Rich Isaacs Nov 03, 2025 #224 How to Post Comments on Copper by Frank Doris Nov 03, 2025 #132 Dr. Patrick Gleeson: The Interview, Part Two by Rich Isaacs Oct 07, 2025 #223 World Fusion Meets Flamenco in Gratitude from Steve Mullins and Rim of the Well by Frank Doris Oct 06, 2025 #223 Judging Albums by Their Covers by Rich Isaacs Oct 06, 2025 #223 Recent Arrivals and 12-inch Royalty by Rudy Radelic Oct 06, 2025 #223 Summer of Creem, Part Two by Wayne Robins Oct 06, 2025 #223 Recording Engineer Barry Diament of Soundkeeper Recordings: Striving for Natural Sound by Frank Doris Oct 06, 2025 #223 Tea on the Terrace by B. Jan Montana Oct 06, 2025 #223 How Good Can Car Audio Get? by Joe Caplan Oct 06, 2025 #223 The Advantages of a Dedicated Listening Room by Paul McGowan Oct 06, 2025 #223 1! 2! 3! 4! Surrounded by the Ramones in Dolby Atmos! by Frank Doris Oct 06, 2025

50 Ways to Read a Record Part 4

50 Ways to Read a Record Part 4

In our last installment, we looked at the range of record groove sizes that were used through the years, and we jumped ahead a bit to the launch of Stereo. In this column we’ll backtrack a bit and look at the record-tracing hardware of the Hi-Fi boom in the ’50s, leading up to the Stereo era.

Microgroove LPs brought with them new concerns regarding tracking. The lighter tracking weights (compared to 78s) increased the likelihood of the stylus jumping out of the groove due to vibration caused by footfalls or acoustic feedback. In addition, the soft vinyl compounds used for LPs were more prone to scratching than the shellac and clay amalgam used in 78s.

A new generation of phono cartridges and tonearms was needed to replace the massive arms and carts of the 78 era. As we saw back in Part 2, ground-up designs like the GE Variable Reluctance line of cartridges and the Fairchild moving coil cartridge designed by Joseph Grado, led the way in lighter, smaller, better-tracking playback gear. The sonic spectacular records often used to show off the new Hi-Fi set required more compliant cartridges to track them, in turn requiring lower-mass tonearms. Although the term “tonearm” was still used in the Hi-Fi and later stereo eras, the term no longer properly described the arm’s function, as it did in early acoustic phonographs. In those days the tonearm carried the needle and sound box which generated the sonic output; sound was then channeled down the interior of the arm, which formed a section of the gramophone’s horn.

Stronger permanent magnet materials developed during World War II made possible the magnetic phono cartridges that quickly  the choice of audio aficionados of the Hi-Fi era.  Cartridges like the Pickering shown in the ad above often featured turnover stylus assemblies which allowed the listener to play both 78s and LPs, at lower tracking weights and with greater precision than earlier ceramic cartridges. Magnetic cartridges had far lower electrical output than ceramics, requiring more-sensitive phono preamps with lower noise—units like the Marantz unit shown above, often referred to as the Model 1. Given the sensitivity of the phono stage, it’s a little astonishing to see the Marantz unit incorporated into a turntable base, in close proximity to the electrical and magnetic fields generated by the turntable motor. Let’s hope everything was well-shielded!

Trackability became an even greater concern with the onset of 45/45 single-groove stereo, as mistracking would be unpleasantly evident in two channels, rather than just one. In addition, mistracking  could affect the channel balance, distorting or even destroying the stereo illusion. At the beginning of the era, some popular cartridges could be converted from mono to stereo. This article from Audio magazine showed how they converted one of the popular GE VR cartridges:

Cutting lathes generally moved the cutting head across the disc with a parallel-tracking arm rather than a pivoted one. Even on home record-cutting units like this Presto, such was the standard:

Logically enough, tonearms appeared which attempted to duplicate the action of the cutting head and eliminate tracking era. There were two basic approaches to maintaining the cartridge tangent to the groove: a true tangential arm, moving the cartridge and arm on a track or trolley across the record; or a somewhat simpler approach using a pantographic, pivoted arrangement. Both design approaches required low friction: any sticking during record playback would likely generate more tracking error than the conventional arms the parallel-trackers were designed to replace.

The tracking requirements of single-groove stereo discs heightened the interest in parallel-tracking. Even earlier mono arms like the English Burne-Jones pantographic arm were converted to stereo:

An early example of a tangential arm was the Truline—here shown with two cartridges for playing back Cook Labs binaural records:

Both types of arms still exist today, in addition to the usual pivoted arms.

In our next installment, we’ll follow the continued development of playback gear as the stereo era progressed.

0 comments

Leave a comment

0 Comments

Your avatar

Loading comments...

🗑️ Delete Comment

Enter moderator password to delete this comment: